Uncategorized

There is a new after-market product for Glock handguns. The new Glock Trigger Locks are called the SiderLock, from Lone Wolf Distributors. This locking mechanism puts a pin across the trigger behind the factory “safe action” release. When pushed from the left side, the pin blocks the release and won’t allow the trigger to be pressed. When you push the pin with the trigger finger, it moves out of the way and the trigger is released allowing the gun to fire.

As explained in the video, this add-on safety has to be disengaged with the trigger finger, forcing you to put your finger on the trigger before you intend to fire the weapon. This goes against the safety training we have all been through. “Never put your finger on the trigger unless you are prepared to fire the gun”. The next three videos will show the process completely. Please watch….

The next video is about the Glock “safe action” trigger that’s factory equipment on all Glock pistols. They are designed to be used without an external safety and are totally safe to carry every day in any properly made holster. The Glocks can be dropped from the roof of your house and won’t discharge unless the trigger is pressed rearward.

The next video shows a comparison of the Glock striker-fired handgun design and some other designs that do require an external safety.

My View

Trigger safeties have been on auto-loading pistols for a very long time, and also on some revolvers. The Glock “safe action” trigger design and “drop safe” features make them just safe as any other handgun on the market. There is no need to add any more to them. The whole purpose of carrying a gun for self-defense is to have it ready when you need it. An extra button to push before firing is another step to remember when the adrenaline is pumping and causing the fine motor skills to be diminished.

These new Glock Trigger Locks are something some people will want, but are really not necessary. If you agree with me, or not, please leave your comments below. They will be greatly appreciated.

Harry

Thanks for coming

What do you think about W.Virginia’s new law eliminating the requirement of a permit to carry a concealed handgun? I say “handgun” instead of “weapon” because the law has no reference to any weapons other than guns (that I’m aware of ). In my state of Nevada, the law specifically addresses guns and call it a Concealed Firearms Permit.

Read the article to the end, then decide for yourself if this is a good idea…….

By COURTNEY HESSLER  5/29/2016

Submitted photo Dwight Edwards, a firearms instructor from Ona, said although West Virginia law no longer requires a permit to carry a concealed handgun for most individuals, he still believes safety courses are necessary. “I believe if you are going to carry (a gun), it’s a very good idea,” he said. “What’s legal and what’s a good idea are completely different things.”

Police continue to speak out in opposition to new gun laws HUNTINGTON – Cabell County law enforcement leaders aren’t happy with the new law allowing people to carry a concealed weapon without a permit because of potential dangers their officers will face.

HUNTINGTON – More than 1 in 10 West Virginia adults has a permit to carry a concealed handgun, and the number of Mountain State residents carrying weapons is likely to increase with the new concealed carry laws that took effect this week.

As of May 24, a new permitless carry law allows West Virginians to carry firearms freely without going through a safety course or having to obtain permits, so long as they meet certain requirements.

House Bill 4145, which was passed in March after originally being vetoed by Gov. Earl Ray Tomblin, also enhances policies for those less than 21 years of age, criminals, defendants in domestic violence cases and anyone with mental impairments.

Supporters applaud the change as a victory for the right to bear arms, but the measure still concerns law enforcement and puts even more responsibility on individuals to handle their firearms safely and responsibly.

Although the bill received bipartisan support, it received criticism from both private citizens and police officials statewide. The bill did not survive the legislative session last year after Tomblin first vetoed it.

West Virginia became the eighth state to allow permitless concealed carry, joining Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Kansas, Maine, Vermont and Wyoming. Permits will still be available for anyone wanting to obtain one and will be helpful for those who want to carry their weapon in states that recognize a West Virginia concealed handgun license.

Even before the law changed, West Virginians had been showing a growing interest in concealed carry.

More than 156,600 West Virginians had permits to carry concealed weapons as of six weeks ago, according to a registry kept by West Virginia State Police. That is about 11 percent of the state’s over-18 population.

The trend is another sign that Americans are feeling more comfortable about owning guns. According to a Gallup survey published in 2014, more than six in 10 Americans believed guns make homes safer, almost flipping from public perception in 2000. In 2000, 35 percent said guns made homes safer, while 51 percent said it made a home less safe.

Concealed carry is a big part                   of life in V.W.

Cabell County Sheriff Tom McComas said in 2015 alone he issued approximately 1,500 new and renewed permits to county residents.

“Cabell County has been one of the highest issuing counties ever since I’ve been sheriff,” he said. “Part of that is due to we were, up until the last census, the second-most populous county in the state. We have always issued numerous gun permits.”

Huntington Police Chief Joe Ciccarelli said there is still heavy opposition from law enforcement on the change.

“I think law enforcement will continue to work to overturn this and get back to some sensible regulations in terms of who carries a firearm,” he said.

Roadblocks will remain in place for some citizens with criminal cases pending and citizens younger than 21.

Anyone convicted of misdemeanor cases involving violence within the past five years or who are the subject of a domestic violence protective order cannot obtain a permit. Anyone under indictment for a felony offense or has been determined to be mentally incompetent or committed to a mental institution also will not be able to obtain a permit.

While permits are still available, the only people required to obtain permits are 18- to 21-year-olds. The law also establishes a requirement for gun safety training participants to fire at least one live round of ammunition during gun safety training courses.

A $25 permit fee was set for 18- to 21-year-old residents. Anyone in that group found concealing a weapon without a permit will face a misdemeanor conviction with up to $1,000 in fines. Second offense is a felony with a one- to five-year sentence and up to $5,000 in fines.

Laws still prohibit carrying firearms into public places like courthouses, prisons, schools and federal buildings.

In a release, National Rifle Association spokeswoman Amy Hunter applauded the changes, calling the reform a great step for regular citizens.

“These important pro-gun reforms recognize that a law-abiding individual’s fundamental right to self-defense should not be conditioned by government-imposed time delays and taxes,” she said.

According to the NRA, no other states with permitless carry have seen a “detrimental effect on public safety.”

McComas said he still expects many people to seek permits because of out-of-state travel and the overall cushion safety courses give to permit holders.

Follow reporter Courtney Hessler at Facebook.com/CHesslerHD and via Twitter @HesslerHD.

My Thoughts On The New Concealed Carry Laws

What W. Virginia did is completely legal according to the Constitution. Many people today are calling it “Constitutional Carry” and the term seems to fit nicely. I approve of the new law, but I question the wisdom of the part that says ” without going through a safety course”. I firmly believe anyone wanting to carry a weapon, whether it’s concealed or not, should have a certain degree of training. It may come from years of training by family members with the experience to do an adequate job of teaching their kids, or another “qualified” instructor. I think, somehow you should be asked to show your competence at responsible gun handling.

Some law enforcement agencies may have concerns with this but just look at the other seven states with Constitutional Carry. They don’t seem to have a problem with it, so why would W. Virginia? This looks like a building trend, doesn’t it? Years ago there were only a couple states with relaxed gun laws. Now there are eight of them. Soon I expect we will be seeing more states joining in. Maybe soon we will also see cooperation with states recognizing all other carry permits just like they do with your driver’s license. Wouldn’t that be an improvement?

As always, if you would like to leave your comments on this article or it’s separate contents, please write a comment in the space provided below. And thanks for reading. I hope you got something good out of it.

I have an update to this article that just came in.

The state of Idaho has just passed a similar law to the one described above in W. Virginia. The new law in Idaho will take effect on July 1st. This is the ninth state to adopt the Constitutional Carry policy as law. Almost 20% of the nation.

Go to this post to read the story and the comments of an attorney familiar with this law and all its ramifications.

https://defensive-handguns.com/concealed-carry-law-concealing-guns-without-permits

Thanks for coming

I know it sounds sexist, but it really isn’t. Women don’t know what they want, in a handgun I mean. But it’s no surprise because men don’t either.

They think they want to carry a gun to protect themselves but have no idea what to buy. So they head down to the first gun store they see and start looking. A lot of the time, the clerk has an idea what he, or she, wants to sell. Many of them don’t even know what questions to ask their potential customer. Most of the time the customer also doesn’t know what questions to ask. 

Sometimes it depends on the look of the lady; how tall is she, how big are her hands, does she look like a Lady or a Woman ( to some people there is a difference), petite or not so much. 

A woman will frequently bring a man to the gun store with her. Being a man he should know of these things, right? Really, lots of men haven’t the first notion of what they are doing around guns, but will they admit it?

What Is The Best Gun For A Woman?

The best hand guns for women is a question with the same answer as for men. The best gun is the one you are comfortable with. There are a lot of factors in that comfortability. Here I will try to list some of the factors for you. Before you buy, do some looking.

  Probably the first answer to settle on is what your purpose for having it will be.

• Why do you want a gun?  What will you use it for? Target practice? Home protection? Personal Defense? All of these answers will have a direct impact on your purchase decision.
• What size gun do you want?  Do you want a hand cannon? Or just a pea shooter?
• What Fits In Your Hand?  What size gun will fit your hands? Can you actually lift and hold the gun you wish to purchase?
• What Can You Handle?  Will you be able to handle the recoil, weight, and pressure of the gun you choose?
• How Will You Carry Your Gun?  This is where the women separate from the men.There are ways for a woman to carry a gun that just don’t work for men. But a woman can carry a gun the same ways any man can.

The Right Gun for a Woman, According to A Woman

Here is an anonymous quote I got from a magazine I read some time ago.

“For some reason, men think women are too stupid to maintain a pistol. They all insist on the .38 special revolver. When I finished school, that is what my brother decided I should have. And I never liked it. I have had it now for 28 years and I actually sold it today. Today when I got up, I just decided that I no longer want it. It is bulky. It is heavy. I cannot conceal it. I want a pistol and that is what I am going to buy. A pistol with a bra holster. Stuff all the men. A gun is like a pair of shoes. Another person cannot choose it for you and decide that it would be a comfortable fit. It is something you have to choose yourself”.

In this instance, the woman, referring to a pistol, is wanting a semi-automatic handgun. Autoloaders are commonly called pistols in today’s firearms world, as opposed to revolvers. Small guns for the “petite, little lady” are not the norm. Women want the same as men do; the best gun to get the job done. Some women like the pistols or revolvers with pink grips, or pastel colored slides, but when it comes down to the real use of the weapon, it’s firepower and fit.

The End Result

There is very little difference between what a woman wants in a handgun and what a man wants. The main concern is what the gun can and will do for them in a time of need. A good resource for this subject would be the US Concealed Carry Association.

Beth Alcazar is one of the writers for their magazine. She is also a working mother and a firearms instructor. Her insights have inspired many women to be better with their weapons and protect themselves and their children; and husbands.

If I have inspired you a little to be interested in self-defense with a firearm, I would like to know. Please leave your comments in the section below. My email address is; [email protected] if that would be your preference. Thank you for stopping by. I hope you enjoyed this article as much as I have.

Harry….with Sherry and our friends, Ranger, and Sierra

Get the Handgun Guide For Women at Amazon.com

The Handgun Guide for Women: Shoot Straight, Shoot Safe, and Carry with Confidence

 

One of the comments I received recently made mention of hoping the safety was on while in a concealed holster. This brings up a good subject to write about; manual handgun safeties.

There are several types of safeties on guns and they all work quite well. Some are built into gun’s mechanisms so the gun won’t operate without activating the safety feature. This would be like the grip lever on the Springfield and the 1911 models made by a number of manufacturers.

The lever on the backstrap is engaged when the weapon is held in a firing position only. this process allows the firing pin, or striker, to be functional. The trigger can’t move unless the lever is depressed first.

Manual levers

Another safety feature is the manual lever on the side of the slide near where your thumb would rest. A large number of handguns have this feature.

There is a red mark on the lever to indicate the firing position, and a white mark to indicate safe. This manual feature has been in use since the beginning of time for manufacture of semi-auto pistols, (commonly called auto -loaders).

Revolvers don’t generally get built with manual safeties. A double action revolver has to have the trigger pulled in order to move the hammer into the firing position, and a single action revolver has to have the hammer pulled back manually before the trigger can be engaged and pressed.

Some guns, like this Springfield Armory, have both the backstrap lever and the manual safety lever on the slide. Built-in redundancy.

Built-in Safeties

There is another design that does not have either a backstrap lever or a manual lever on the slide. That is the design of the Glock semi-auto pistol. The Glock and a few others have three safety features built into the inner workings to prevent negligent discharge of the weapon. This is called a “drop safe” feature.

This gun can be dropped from almost any distance and it will not go off. The trigger must be pressed in order for the three sequential safety mechanisms to be activated. This is not a double action gun. If the slide isn’t retracted and released, then the trigger action will not be engaged. You can’t pull the trigger unless the slide is “racked”.

Personal Choice

With so many gun makers and so many models being produced, it is impractical to list all the different guns and the types of safeties they have, so it behooves the potential buyer to do some research. Visit a few gun stores and look at the many types. “Play” with them in th store and decide what it is you will be comfortable using.

Many of the handgun instructors and “gurus” will tell you not to use the manual safety, because the built-in features are satisfactory to keep you safe. They feel that if you need to use the gun in an urgent situation, you will either forget to release the safety or just get too clumsy in the excitement that you won’t be able to operate it. Also, some holsters are built without considering the safety, and it can be either set or released by holstering or drawing the weapon.

As long as it’s in the holster, the trigger is covered and protected. The most common way of carrying a handgun, concealed or not, is loaded with a round chambered. The proper draw is with the finger along the side of the weapon and lot near the trigger until you are on target and ready to fire.

My Choice

My personal preference is the Glock. I don’t have to be concerned about remembering or fumbling with the safety levers and the time it may take to activate it. Glocks are used by a large number of Law Enforcement Agencies for the same reasons. If you’re in the market, you just have to do your own research. If there is anything I can tell you, I will be more than happy to assist and do my part in keeping you as safe as possible. Just leave a comment at the bottom of the page or send an email. [email protected]. Thanks for listening and stay safe.

This is an email from the Founder of US Concealed Carry Association. His views and opinion of the shameful behavior of the current administration are shared by a very large part of our society. I sincerely hope the entire Nation… Continue Reading

Source:  http://www.nevadadailymail.com/story/2314743.html Gun laws don’t work on people who break the law Saturday, June 18, 2016 Jason Mosher I have heard more comments in the past few days that people “don’t need assault rifles” than I have heard in the… Continue Reading

Source:  https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/06/16/what-the-fatal-attack-on-a-british-politician-says-about-guns-in-the-u-k/ What the fatal attack on a British politician says about guns in the U.K. By Adam Taylor June 16 Four days after the horrific mass shooting in Orlando sparked a fresh debate about gun control in the United… Continue Reading

Concealing guns without permits: Here’s what new law allows – and doesn’t Prologue: Well, don’t that beat all !! Now Idaho has also joined the states with Constitutional Carry laws. Idaho and W.Virginia at the same time. This now makes… Continue Reading

Permitless carry now law in WV A Prologue What do you think about W.Virginia’s new law eliminating the requirement of a permit to carry a concealed handgun? I say “handgun” instead of “weapon” because the law has no reference to… Continue Reading

The Sheepdogs Prayer This poem has inspired a great many concealed weapons carriers all over the free world. By “free” world, I mean those parts of the world that are free to carry weapons and defend themselves from the “bad guys”.… Continue Reading

Manual Handgun Safeties One of the comments I received recently made mention of hoping the safety was on while in a concealed holster. This brings up a good subject to write about; manual handgun safeties. There are several types of… Continue Reading

Is Six Enough?-Do I Need More? There are several viewpoints on the subject of how many rounds would I need to thwart an attacker. Revolvers, also known as “wheel guns”, will commonly have either five or six rounds in the… Continue Reading

What Do Women Want? – In A Hand Gun, I Mean I know it sounds sexist, but it really isn’t. Women don’t know what they want, in a handgun I mean. But it’s no surprise because men don’t either. They think… Continue Reading

Don’t Buy Your Wife Something You Want To Shoot What does your wife want to shoot? This is something men need to learn: Men buy guns that most women won’t shoot. That is, men will buy that ideal self-defense gun,… Continue Reading

Prologue

This question has been asked by thousands of people over the vast expanse of time; probably by millions of people. Should Christians kill in self-defense? By reprinting this article from the US Concealed Carry Association, I hope to give you an answer by someone who reads and studies the Word of God on a regular basis.

As a Christian man, I do believe in the right to defend yourself from a deadly or seriously harmful threat coming from another human being. This is why I carry a licensed concealed weapon and have been trained in its proper use. It is my true belief this article will provide the answers you are looking for if you are asking the question; Should Christians kill in self-defense?

Harry

Please read on…

Well-meaning people sometimes ask me how a Christian, especially a preacher, could carry a gun. In their minds, carrying a gun and being a Christian are mutually exclusive. How could a Christian kill somebody? How could a Christian be so paranoid? Shouldn’t he or she have faith in God? What they fail to realize is that it is my lack of faith in man–not in God–that causes me to carry. God is all knowing and wise, but some men are idiots. The Bible does say that God “sends rain on the just and the unjust” (Matthew 5:45)ⁱ, and this is why I am prepared and carry my umbrella. By umbrella, I mean my Glock 19 and my Smith and Wesson 642. While this article is not exhaustive, it is a good starting point and can give you some “ammunition” to answer arguments that might come your way.

“The Bible says, ‘Thou shalt not kill.’” It is true that the sixth commandment recorded in Exodus 20:13 states that we should not kill. However, a closer examination of this Scripture reveals its true meaning.

Before I get into the Bible, I would like to make a statement. I can’t back it up with hard data; it is simply the impression that I get from talking to different Christians. Here it goes: The majority of Christians who do not favor the use of firearms in self-defense have this view simply because of their unfamiliarity with, and subsequent fear of, guns. Perhaps they knew someone who was wounded or killed in an accident involving guns. They attribute the accident to the firearm itself and not to the person who, because of his or her failure to observe safety rules, caused the accident. What they do not know about guns, coupled with the commonly accepted ideal that Christians should be pacifists, causes them to draw the conclusion that self-defense with a firearm is inherently wrong. While they have the right not to carry a firearm, they cannot and should not cite the Bible as their reason for said abstinence. It just does not support such a position.

Now let us look at the Bible. The first statement that most people make is the most obvious: “The Bible says, ‘Thou shalt not kill.’”ⁱⁱ It is true that the sixth commandment recorded in Exodus 20:13 states that we should not kill. However, a closer examination of this Scripture reveals its true meaning. The Hebrew word used for “kill” is ratsach, which means “to murder, slay or kill.”ⁱⁱⁱ It implies murder and not killing in self-defense. As a matter of fact, most translations render this verse, “Do not murder.” The Bible in Basic English goes so far as to state, “Do not put anyone to death without cause.”^ivMurder is sin because it is motivated out of vengeance, and the Scripture says that vengeance belongs to the Lord alone (Deuteronomy 32:35).^v

Even Merriam Webster recognizes a difference between the murder and killing, defining murder as, “the crime of unlawfullykilling a person, especially with malice aforethought”^vi (italics added); and killing as, “to deprive of life.”^vii Simply put, killing in self-defense is not murder. In a self-defense situation, one does not set out to necessarily kill the other party. He or she simply attempts to use equal and appropriate force to neutralize an attacker.^viii Sometimes this results in the attacker’s death. In light of this information, one cannot equate self-defense with murder.

Another popular portion of Scripture quoted by advocates of pacifism is Matthew 5:38-39: “Ye have heard that it hath been said, an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth.

Another popular portion of Scripture quoted by advocates of pacifism is Matthew 5:38-39: “Ye have heard that it hath been said, an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth. ³⁹But I say unto you, that ye resist not evil; but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.”^ix People take this to mean that, as Christians, they should take whatever evil comes their way. They conclude that the answer to evil action is simply inaction. This passage does not teach pacifism though; it teaches against revenge. Several translations make this point more clear. The Good News Translation records Matthew 5:39 as, “But now I tell you, do not take revenge on someone who wrongs you. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, let him slap your left cheek too.”^x In addition, the Contemporary English Version states, “But I tell you not to try to get even with a person who has done something to you. When someone slaps your right cheek, turn and let that person slap your other cheek.”^xi

Furthermore, we should note that the context of this verse does not include life-threatening situations. There is a big difference between a small, hand-to-hand skirmish and someone pulling a gun or knife on you. The implication here is that you should turn the other cheek when someone wants to bully you. As a matter of fact, the New Life Bible records this verse as, “But I tell you, do not fight with the man who wants to fight.”^xii Common sense would (hopefully) dictate that you couldn’t fly off the handle and shoot someone just because they bully you. When that bullying escalates to the threatening of life, however, then appropriate action must be taken to protect the sanctity of life—your life.

However, Jesus’ statement is consistent with the rest of the Bible. Do not strike out in anger or vengeance; let the Lord settle your (less than lethal) disputes.

Exodus 22:2-3 in the Amplified Bible reads, “If a thief is found breaking in and is struck so that he dies, there shall be no blood shed for him. ³But if the sun has risen [so he can be seen], blood must be shed for slaying him. The thief [if he lives] must make full restitution. If he has nothing, then he shall be sold for his theft.”^xiiiThese are important verses that favor self-defense. Seemingly complex at first, they are really quite simple when studied more closely.

One must keep in mind that at the time that this was written, the level of artificial light we have today did not exist. Moonlight could not be relied upon to sufficiently light a home. If a thief broke into a home, and the master of the house was awakened, the homeowner could legally kill the thief without fear of retribution. The reason for this was simple: At night, the homeowner could not see the thief well enough to discern what (if any) weapons he may have had. He did not know the thief’s intentions. He was already at a disadvantage due to the low light and the fact that his home was invaded. Also, since it was night, he could not quickly gain assistance from others. His ability to apprehend the thief was greatly diminished, if not altogether removed.

Consequently, the law allowed him to “kill first and ask questions later.” However, in the daylight, the homeowner was able to see his attacker and his weapons. He was more likely to be able to see if he were up against a hardened murderer or a homeless man simply trying to steal food. The homeowner had the advantage because he could now call for help and could more easily detain the thief.

Moonlight could not be relied upon to sufficiently light a home. If a thief broke into a home, and the master of the house was awakened, the homeowner could legally kill the thief without fear of retribution.

According toJohn Wesley’s Explanatory Notes on the Whole Bible, “If a thief broke into a house in the night, and was killed in doing it, his blood was upon his own head. But if it were in the day-time that the thief was killed, he that killed him was accountable for it, unless it were in the necessary defense of his own life (italics added).”^xiv The “daylight” stipulation here is clear: If you know someone is simply trying to steal, you can shoot him. However, the religious and legal worlds would probably question your ethics. On the other hand, if the thief attempts to cause grave bodily harm, then you would be justified in shooting. At that point, you would not be taking defensive and possibly fatal action against a simple, would-be thief, but someone who has displayed intent to severely harm or murder you.

Massad Ayoob comments on this in his book, In the Gravest Extreme: “It is questionable whether anyone has the moral right, although the legal right still exists in many places, to use deadly force solely in defense of property. A house-breaker should be shot only if he presents a deadly danger to the innocent people therein, not to prevent his making off with the family silver.”^xv Two more biblical commentaries offer additional insight: “The owner of property had the right to protect his property with force, but only with reasonable force. It was assumed that if it was daylight, the property owner could defend himself short of lethal force (italics added).”^xvi “A robber breaking into a house at midnight might, in self-defense, be slain with impunity; but if he was slain after sunrise, it would be considered murder, for it was not thought likely an assault would then be made upon the lives of the occupants (italics added).”^xvii

Lastly, let us examine a popular portion of New Testament Scripture. Matthew 26:50-52 in the Amplified Bible records this event. “Jesus said to him, friend, for what are you here? Then they came up and laid hands on Jesus and arrested Him. ⁵¹And behold, one of those who were with Jesus reached out his hand and drew his sword, and striking the body servant of the high priest, cut off his ear. ⁵²Then Jesus said to him, put your sword back into its place, for all who draw the sword will die by the sword.”^xviii In this passage, Jesus and his disciples were approached by a mob whose intention was to arrest Jesus. The disciples thought that Jesus was going to establish an earthly kingdom, and did not realize that he would have to die in order for the New Testament to come into effect.

Therefore, at that moment in the garden of Gethsemane, Peter was wrong to strike out at the high priest’s servant. He did not swing his sword in defense of himself or of Jesus; but rather, he swung it out of anger. Perhaps he was filled with indignation when he realized that Judas, his own brother in the Lord, had betrayed them all. Jesus was not stating that those who carried and used swords would die because they used them. Indeed, if Jesus were opposed to the carrying of weapons, why would he allow his disciples—those who would model his life to the New Testament church—to carry them? Surely he would have prevented them. However, Jesus’ statement is consistent with the rest of the Bible. Do not strike out in anger or vengeance; let the Lord settle your (less than lethal) disputes.

Carrying a firearm is a tremendous responsibility that requires a safe mindset and level-headedness. If you are unable to insure that you can act responsibly while carrying a gun, then do not carry.

In conclusion, Christians can carry a gun and use it if it is necessary to ward off life-threatening attacks. Obviously, such use should only be in response to an event that causes one to be afraid for his life. Christians, or anyone for that matter, should never seek to cause harm after the threat has been neutralized. Such would be revenge, and the Bible clearly states in Romans 12:19, “Dear friends, never avenge yourselves. Leave that to God….”^xix  Carrying of a firearm is a tremendous responsibility that requires a safe mindset and level-headedness. If you are unable to insure that you can act responsibly while carrying a gun, then do not carry. However, if you are certain that you can safely and conscientiously carry a gun, then do so and pray that you never have to use it.

ⁱThe Holy Bible, New King James Version. Copyright 1982 by Thomas Nelson, Inc. http://www.studylight.org (accessed 21 July 2006).

ⁱⁱThe King James (Authorized) Bible. Public Domain.http://www.studylight.org (accessed 18 July 2006).

ⁱⁱⁱBrown, Driver, Briggs and Gesenius. “Hebrew Lexicon entry for Ratsach”. “The Old Testament Hebrew Lexicon”.http://www.studylight.org/lex/heb/view.cgi?number=7523(accessed 19 July 2006).

^ivThe Bible in Basic English. Copyright 1956 by Cambridge [Eng.]: University Press in association with Evans Brothers.http://www.studylight.org (accessed 17 July 2006).

^vThe King James (Authorized) Bible. Public Domain.http://www.studylight.org (accessed 18 July 2006).

^vi“Murder.” Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary. 2006.http://www.m-w.com (accessed 18 July 2006).

^vii“Kill.” Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary. 2006. http://www.m-w.com (accessed 18 July 2006).

^viiiAyoob, Massad. In the Gravest Extreme. Copyright 1980 by Massad F. and Dorothy A. Ayoob. p. 9.

^ixThe King James (Authorized) Bible. Public Domain.http://www.studylight.org (accessed 18 July 2006).

^xGood News Translation. Second Edition Copyright 1992 by American Bible Society. http://www.americanbible.org (accessed 21 July 2006).

^xiContemporary English Version. Copyright 1995 by American Bible Society. http://www.americanbible.org (accessed 21 July 2006).

^xiiNew Life Bible. Copyright 1969 by Christian Literature International. http://www.newlifebible.org (accessed 20 July 2006).

^xiiiAmplified Bible, Copyright 1954, 1958, 1962, 1964, 1965, 1987 by The Lockman Foundation. http://www.Lockman.org (accessed 19 July 2006).

^xivWesley, John. “Commentary on Exodus 22.” John Wesley’s Explanatory Notes on the Whole Bible.http://www.studylight.org/com/wen/view.cgi?book=ex&chapter=022.1765 (accessed 19 July 2006).

^xvAyoob, Massad. In the Gravest Extreme. Copyright 1980 by Massad F. and Dorothy A. Ayoob. p. 1.

^xviGuzik, David. David Guzik’s Commentaries on the Bible. Copyright 2004 by David Guzik.http://www.enduringword.com/commentaries/0222.htm (accessed 20 July 2006).

^xviiJamieson, Robert, D.D. “Commentary on Exodus 22”. Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible.http://www.studylight.org/com/jfb/view.cgi?book=ex&chapter=022. 1871 (accessed 18 July 2006).

^xviiiAmplified Bible, Copyright 1954, 1958, 1962, 1964, 1965, 1987 by The Lockman Foundation. http://www.Lockman.org (accessed 19 July 2006).

^xixNew Living Translation. Copyright 1996 by Tyndale Charitable Trust. http://www.studylight.org (accessed 19 July 2006).

 

[ Rev. David Beeson is the Assistant Pastor at a Pentecostal church in Shreveport, LA. His carry guns currently include a Smith and Wesson 642, a Glock 19 and a Para Ordnance TAC S. He enjoys reading, preaching, shooting and spending time with his family. You can reach him at: [email protected] ]

Should Christians kill in self-defense? After reading this article and studying what I know to be true, I believe that, as a Christian, I have the right, and responsibility, to carry a firearm for defense of myself, my family and those innocents around me. It is my duty and I don’t approach it lightly. Some serious thought and training have gone into the decision. I feel ready and justified in the event I am called to perform this duty.

If you feel the same way, then I strongly urge you to get the necessary proper training before you embark on this journey into a new lifestyle. There is a Comments section below for you to respond to this article in any way you feel appropriate. Please do so…

As the owner of several guns, the Glock 17 Gen 4 review is something I feel qualified to offer because I carry one almost daily. I also have a couple other Glocks and some Rugers that I enjoy shooting. The Glock 17 Gen 4 and G43 are my first choices for EDC (every day carry).

The Glock line of semi-auto pistols has been around for over 30 years now and they have gotten a strong foothold on the market. They were not the first to produce a gun with the polymer frame. They are, however, very light and the safe action trigger system was revolutionary for the time. They were also very affordable to just about anyone who wanted one.

Here are some of the features of the Glock 17 Gen 4 (4th generation);

• Trigger action does not require extensive training
• Safe action trigger makes external manual safety unnecessary
• Minimal maintenance
• Impervious to most solvents, oil and water
• Strong, lightweight frame
• Chambered in 9×19 Luger for lighter recoil
• sold new with three 17 round magazines
• MSRP around $600.00

I mentioned the safe action trigger system earlier. This was a new design exclusive to the Glock at the time. Here,s how it works.

When the slide is brought to the rear and released, the firing striker pin is only brought half way back to the ready.The trigger has a lever attached that must be pressed straight back before the trigger can move. This, in turn, moves an internal lever that allows the firing pin to move to position. Then when the internal lever is activated by the trigger moving rearward, the striker pin is moved back farther into the firing position and is released when the trigger is pressed all the way back. This combination of features removes the need for an external safety making the Glock one of the easiest to operate by anyone, regardless of advanced training. All that is needed is to press the trigger, fire, release to reset the trigger, and repeat.

The Glock 17 is a great combat pistol. It is fast into action and easy to handle. If you’re an occasional shooter who, like many of us, simply cannot get in the practice needed, the 9mm handgun makes a lot of sense. With modern high-performance ammunition, it is difficult to be better armed without spending a great deal of time and effort in mastering a heavier caliber.

Accuracy Results

Manufacturer	Bullet Weight	Type	Grouping
Black Hills	115-grain	FMJ Remanufactured	3.5 inches
Black Hills	115-grain	EXP	2.0 inches
Black Hills	124-grian	JHP +P	2.5 inches
CCI Blazer	124-Grain	FMJ	3.25 inches
Speer	115-grain	Gold Dot	2.5 inches
Federal	124-grain	HydraShok	2.4 inches
PMC Bronze	115-grain		4.5 inches
Wolf	124-grain	FMJ	4.0 inches

GLOCK 17 GEN 4
Action	Semiautomatic
Barrel Length	4.49 inches
Caliber	9mm
Overall Height	5.43 inches
Overall Length	7.32 inches
Overall Width	1.18 inches
Weight Loaded	31.91 pounds
Sights	Fixed
Grip	Interchangeable backstraps
Magazine	17 rounds
Frame	Rough Textured Frame

If you are caught in a situation in which you are outnumbered, much may be said for a fast handling pistol with light recoil that allows a trained shooter to make multiple hits quickly. The advantages of the Glock became apparent to law enforcement and the pistol was adopted by many agencies.

The drawbacks are few. The Glock demands a locked wrist when firing, or the pistol will short cycle, commonly known as “limp-wristing”. This is common with many of the smaller self-loading handguns. Simply maintain a proper grip on the pistol and this will not be an issue.

Nothing is perfect and over the years, there have been a number of improvements on the original handgun. Added to the pistol are serrations and finger grooves to improve adhesion. The gun also comes with an assortment of backstrap inserts to customize the fit of the grip.

The pistol features a newly designed recoil rod that helps control recoil and limit wear on the handgun. Among the first new features you notice on the Gen 4 is the slightly extended magazine release.

There is a raised bridge around the slide lock that helps protect it from being mistakenly pushed. This is a good added feature. Sometimes the thumb locks the slide open when firing, although mine has never done this.

The pistol features a good reserve of ammunition. The Glock 17 Gen 4 is supplied with three magazines. With a 17-round capacity, this gives you 52 rounds available if you carry a double magazine pouch on the off-side and a loaded chamber.

Sights

The Glock 17 is equipped with three-dot iron sights from the box. They are said to be the most accurate open sights for serious target or competition shooting. Some other sights are available and can be installed with the use of a couple special tools.

Concealment For Carry

This is also a good handgun for concealed carry. With the proper holster, it can be worn under a shirt or jacket either OWB or IWB. I have carried it both ways and it conceals just fine, although it will print a bit with t-shirts or light colored shirts.

In My Opinion

This Glock 17 Gen 4 Review is based on my own experience and the experience of many law enforcement agencies all around the world, to include some military units. If you have used a Glock 17 or the newer Gen 4, or if you would like more knowledge of them, please leave a comment below. I will get back to you as promptly as possible. Also, if you have a G 17 and would like a Kydex concealment holster for it, I’ll make one for you. Just email me with details at; [email protected].    

Glock: The Rise of America’s Gun

Available at Amazon.com

The US Concealed Carry Association is the #1 National Organization to offer Financial and Peace-Of-Mind insurance coverage to responsible gun owners. Once again, they have added updates to your benefits of being a member of this group. Established over 10 years ago,… Continue Reading