• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Defensive Handguns
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Affiliate Disclosure

Defensive Handguns

Handguns and things related

  • Reviews
  • Public Service
  • Training

Top

Can You Shoot The Intruder – In your Home?

August 17, 2016 by HarryJamesGuns

stingray-draw400px-8306562

This is a question most of us have asked ourselves a dozen times, or more. Can I shoot an intruder? Do I have the ability, or the intestinal fortitude, to shoot someone in my home? Will I have what it takes to pull the trigger? Then the next question will be; If I pull the trigger, what will happen to me and my family? Let’s try to get some answers here.

Should you shoot the intruder?

Who among us hasn’t considered the likelihood that we may be called upon to use lethal force in self-defense or to protect innocent life? We pray it never happens but if we are prepared to shoot someone, however justified, then we must be equally prepared to deal with the consequences. I am constantly trying to improve the resources and skills I need to protect my family just like you. Yet a critical part of that preparation includes knowing what will happen and what to do after you shoot. Do you have a clue about the unbelievable complexities that will occur after using deadly force? Do you know what resources exist to help you deal with them? If not, then this article is your wake-up call. It is time to act – now – so that you will be ready in such a situation.

Picture This Scenario

Can you shoot the intruder?

You are sitting in your favorite easy chair watching a made-for-TV movie. It’s 10:15 pm and your coffee cup just ran empty (or maybe you prefer a glass of Jack). Suddenly there’s a banging on the front door. You’re startled and jump to your feet, reach for the .45 on your hip. and get ready to defend yourself and your family in the bedrooms. Then the door gives way and here comes the intruder with a knife in his hand. He sees you across the room and starts coming at you. You yell at him to stop, but he keeps coming. You shoot once, twice, hitting him in the chest He drops the knife, but keeps coming at you. You shoot again. This time, he’s hit in the neck and falls to the floor. You pick up the phone and call 911 and tell them you have been assaulted in your home and someone has been injured. You need the police and an ambulance. What do you do now?

Then the door gives way and here comes the intruder with a knife in his hand. He sees you across the room and starts coming at you. You shoot once, twice, hitting him in the chest He drops the knife, but keeps coming at you. You shoot again. This time, he’s hit in the neck and falls to the floor. You pick up the phone, call 911 and tell them you have been assaulted in your home and someone has been injured. You need the police and an ambulance. What do you do now?

You just shot an armed intruder in self-defense. You have also just stepped into the middle of a legal minefield. This instance is a clear case of self-defense. Will it be seen that way? The widely-held belief that you are innocent until proven guilty cannot be presumed. The new world you have just entered is far from ideal and the burden of proving your innocence will be on you. What happens next? You will be anxious to talk to the first responders who just arrived, probably police and paramedics. You will also have to overcome an overwhelming and immediate desire to begin justifying your actions to anyone who will listen to you. But for now, saying as little as possible will be the best decision of your life. However, you will only restrain yourself if you know why it is so critical. And you know this because it is one of the key parts of your previous training.

Enter “the system”

gavel-2337932

Can you defend yourself in court?

I am not a lawyer. I am not a law enforcement officer. But I do have some knowledge of how the legal system works in a case like this. Realize that what is written here is not to be construed as legal advice in any way. It is an exhortation to do your homework, make a plan, and assemble a small team – a lawyer and a few key friends – who agree to be available at a moment’s notice as you will be for them.

The daily world the lawyers and police inhabit is a legal procedural system that is designed to establish whether a crime was committed and to identify possible suspects as quickly as possible. These are the people who just showed up at your home in response to your frantic call. And there you stand with a gun and a body at your feet. The police are amazing at empathizing while getting the info from you that they know you are dying to unburden yourself with.

All of this will happen before your attorney arrives. Getting as much information from you as soon as possible is their goal and it is a certainty that what you say will be used against you if needed. Talking without counsel will almost invariably hurt you. Even if the shoot is clearly justified, they will still be trying to get all the details from you. They will tell you they are trying to help and need your cooperation in order to clear you.

But helping you is not their priority. That’s your lawyer’s job. What are they trying to do? They are gathering information to feed to the system. Realize that your innocence is just one of many outcomes available once the information is gathered and analyzed. The legal system is judged successful when cases are closed and convictions are handed down. That’s their true goal – it’s not to help you get cleared of wrongdoing. They don’t work to answer to you. They may be sympathetic but their job is to feed the system as it is currently designed. Justice may be the stated goal in broad terms but closing the case is the real objective. Getting you justice is your lawyer’s job. Are you getting the idea?

The Castle Doctrine

If an intruder comes into your house, do you have rights when it comes to protecting yourself?

The “Castle Doctrine” is a law in a large part of the country that gives homeowners the right to defend themselves if an intruder enters their home.

It is called the “Castle Law” because citizens can consider their home as a castle, and they have the right to protect it. Other laws, such as “Do Not Retreat”, commonly called “stand your ground”, help blanket potential victims from becoming suspects. In some jurisdictions, as in Nevada, the Castle Doctrine has been extended to also include your vehicle.

Major Randy Robertson with the Muscogee County, Georgia, Sheriff’s Office said, “Citizens who find themselves in situations where they are threatened with severe injury or death can protect themselves with whatever level of force necessary.”

There are some stipulations to this law. If you are both outside on your property, you have every right to shoot, but if you are inside your home and the intruder is outside, you have to wait until the suspect crosses that threshold before you can defend yourself.

“If you are inside your house, secure, and someone comes into your front yard, I don’t think the law would extend outside of your home because you are under no imminent threat,” Robertson explained.

You also have to take into consideration just how threatening the individual is, meaning if a small female was coming towards a large man, he wouldn’t necessarily be covered by the law. But Robertson says if the roles are reversed, “Georgia law interprets the threat and some of those situations, especially a small female and the aggressor is a male, and he comes to the door armed, the citizen has to make an adjustment and an evaluation of the situation and handle it to what they think is best to protect themselves.”

Of course, depending on the situation, the District Attorney will have to determine if any charges will be filed against the homeowner.

Do Your Research and Plan Ahead

There is good news, though. Numerous good books and resources are available to help you. My goal is to raise your awareness of this issue to a level where you realize you need to act today. Without a plan, you will be at the mercy of events out of your control.

Start by thinking about how all of your past and present decisions and life choices will appear in the harsh light of the legal investigation you may face tomorrow. Which choices? All of them. You will be amazed about the dozens of things you do innocently every day that will be portrayed negatively by an unsympathetic legal system. How your friends and neighbors describe what you say and do will get put on display. Will your personality and the gun-related details of your life make you look like Joe Regular Citizen or a crazed vigilante in the hands of a skilled prosecutor? Don’t think it can happen? It’s all about the spin. Here are a few examples:

“You own an excessive number of guns and shoot frequently Mr. Smith…looks like you finally got your chance to use one.”

“Your honor, the bumper stickers and rifle rack on Mr. Smith’s truck demonstrate a strong mistrust of government and establish a vigilante mindset.”

“The range master at your gun club has testified that you always use representations of people as targets instead of a simple bullseye Mr. Smith. I think the jury would like to know why?”

“So you have testified that the man you shot was someone who was known to you and, in fact, owed you money. Can you explain why he was in your house that afternoon?”

These examples demonstrate how quickly any simple innocent act can be spun negatively and strung together to make you look like the criminal and portray the person who broke into your house and attacked you as the victim. You will want to assemble a small team who can mutually agree to be available should the need arise. Meanwhile, here are some things to get you started.

Key Areas to Consider

When is lethal force legally justified?

home-invasion-2697985

When can you shoot the intruder?

Case law justifying lethal force throughout the U.S. is generally consistent and of necessity is severely limited. The only time lethal force is justified is when someone reasonably believes that their life or the life of someone else is in immediate jeopardy. This is known as the “reasonable man theory”. The justification only exists while the threat is present (or perceived to be present). In the opening scenario, you pointed your gun at a knife-wielding attacker who was ignoring your commands to stop. But the moment he drops the knife or turns and retreats does he cease to be an immediate threat? If a reasonable man would conclude yes, then the justification for lethal force ceases as well. Is someone stealing your stuff? Nope. Breaking into your house? Not unless you truly believed (and can justify by the circumstances over and over later) that you believed your life was in danger.

“I did everything in my power!”

You will be asked what you did to address the threat prior to shooting. In escalating order these things include fleeing, a verbal command, physical restraint, use of pepper spray or some other object, and finally your firearm. If any of these things are available you will be asked why you did not or could not use them before resorting to lethal force.

“I was in fear for my life!”

There are many ways to express this but the reality is that you must genuinely believe that you were in fear for your life or that of another and saw no other way of escape before you will be cleared for using lethal force. Repeat it early and often. Expressions of remorse are normal and can be helpful or may be construed as guilt. That is why you should say very little and insist on speaking to your lawyer before making a statement or agreeing to be questioned.

“I had no choice but to shoot!”

If the attacker continues to advance and can’t be deterred any other way, the last resort may be to fire your weapon. Self-defense doctrine suggests you should keep firing until the threat ceases. Next, any secondary threats (such as an accomplice) should be dealt with. Once the threat ceases then contact the authorities as quickly as possible, usually via 911.

What will you do after the shooting is over?

330717_1280x720-6473012

The police will do their job.

You will now be in a highly agitated state and are capable (likely) to do and say things you will regret later. These are normal tendencies but with some forethought and planning, the damage to you can be minimized. If you do not call 911 right away it will go poorly for you. This is the conventional wisdom and it makes some sense. Calling quickly and rendering aid will support the fact that you are the victim here and did not want to kill anyone. Say as little as possible because everything you say from here on out will be used against you if it can be. The minimum suggested is something like. “This is John Smith of 123 Main Street. I was just attacked in my home and was afraid for my life. Please send an ambulance because someone has been shot.” It is also perceived that the first one to call 911 is the victim.

After calling 911

After you call 911, you lose control of events almost immediately. For starters, the phone you just used to call 911 on is usually ‘locked’ so you cannot make any other calls on it. Calling your lawyer or a support team member as soon as possible is advisable (on another phone). Say little to anyone except that you want to help and will make a statement after speaking to your lawyer. If your lawyer is not available, call a prearranged friend (you have a team, right?). Have them make all necessary calls for you (lawyer, family, pastor, etc.) as you may be unable to do so. They will be questioned later about why they got a call from you so quickly so their response needs to be solid as well.

Then the police will arrive and they won’t know who the good guy is. Their first priority is officer safety followed by bystander safety, securing the scene, and then determining what just happened. Make sure they know it’s you that called. Having a just-fired gun in your hand is not the best way to greet them. Make sure your weapon is secured and safe. It will be confiscated by law enforcement immediately and this is routine. Your hands may be bagged to preserve evidence of gunshot residue (GSR). Permission to search the rest of your house will be requested (or may just be done if the police feel it’s necessary). The stated explanation will be to secure everyone’s safety but equally important will be to examine what role you played in the events. Avoid this if you can. Hopefully, your other firearms are locked up and secure and not all in one place should the decision be made to confiscate them. Do not appear to be a threat in any way.

Stop Talking!

When they start pressing you with questions, it will get tricky. There is surprisingly little consensus on what or how much to say. The rule here is “Less is better”. I should point out that an officer involved in a shooting is presumed innocent pending an inquiry and is treated very differently than a citizen. He is given representation immediately and is not required to say anything until the rep or lawyer can meet with them and they have a chance to calm down. They are usually placed on paid administrative leave for several weeks. You and I will have to try to go to work in the morning. Yet if we try to take the same approach by wanting to confer with counsel before giving a statement, it is presumed we are trying to hide something. Doesn’t seem fair but it is true. The standards are very different. I believe by now you are getting the idea.

Some expert suggestions

Massad Ayoob, noted expert in the self-defense use of firearms suggests that people memorize these five steps and use them immediately and nothing more.

“This person attacked me.” – establishes that you are the victim.

“I will sign a complaint.” – confirms that you are the victim

Point out evidence that supports you before it disappears.

Point out witnesses before they disappear.“Officer, you will have my full cooperation after I have spoken with my attorney.”

“Officer, you will have my full cooperation after I have spoken with my attorney.”

His further suggestion is to request medical attention for yourself as you may be unknowingly injured, in shock, or something similar. It will also allow time for you to regroup your thoughts to avoid saying incriminating or conflicting things.

Alan Korwin is a widely-read 2nd Amendment rights author from Phoenix. Here are his new Safety Rules for Self Defense from his book After You Shoot.

If you shoot in self-defense you must then defend yourself against execution for murder

When you drop the hammer plan to cash in your life savings for your lawyer’s retainer. Avoid this unless your life depends on it.

Sometimes the innocent get decent treatment and sometimes they don’t

It’s always better to avoid a gunfight than to win one.

If innocent life doesn’t depend on it, don’t shoot. And if it does, don’t miss.

Expect unbelievable levels of scrutiny

Every decision you have made in your life up to this point will come into question at some point. You will have to justify the pertinent ones. Here are a few ways you will be challenged for starters:

1. Why did you shoot? Why did you feel threatened? 2. What did you do/say prior to shooting that could have prevented this? 3. Why that choice of pistol…shotgun…type of ammo? 4. How long or why did you wait to call 911? 5. Who else have you contacted? Why?

6. Did you know the victim? (Notice that now he is the victim and not you?)

Remember that the job of the police and prosecutor is to get you to tell them as much as they can get from you before your lawyer arrives. By the way, the time to establish a relationship with an attorney is before all this happens as part of your team. Don’t ask for an attorney – you must request to speak with YOUR attorney. Make sure you have one. Korwin’s After You Shoot has some great suggestions about how to put a team together.

In Closing

So the question still begs an answer; Can you shoot the Intruder? After you’ve read this article, you may decide you don’t want to shoot the intruder. There have been some concealed weapons carriers choose not to carry anymore. They are willing to take their chances with the thugs on the street instead of the thugs in the legal system.

I truly hope you got some insight into how the system works. This article should give you a lot of food for thought, and you may choose not to carry in hopes that you will never need to defend yourself or your loved ones. I pray you never have to make that choice. Please leave your thoughts and comments with me below.

 

Filed Under: Public Service, Top

Reasons to Carry A Gun

August 17, 2016 by HarryJamesGuns

edc-heavy-7179018

“What’s in your pockets?”

Have you ever asked yourself why you carry a gun? Have you thought about not carrying?

People give all sorts of reasons to carry a gun. Most are for self-defense, but not all.

I’ve done a lot of reading about the subject and it strikes me how so many gun carriers don’t carry for self-defense. “Because I can” is one of the top reasons I’ve heard. To me, this isn’t good enough.

Here is a short list I have heard of the top reasons to carry a gun.

You may find yourself here more often than you like.

Because the law says I can. In my opinion, this is just plain nuts. It’s not a good enough reason to carry a gun. Just because you can doesn’t mean you should. It’s like carrying a fire extinguisher everywhere you go. You can do it if you want, but is it wise? Especially if you don’t know how to use it, don’t know when to use it, or maybe it doesn’t even work.

Do we still have a Militia?

It’s my 2nd Amendment right. This is very true. It is your 2nd amendment right to carry a gun. It’s also your 2nd amendment right not to carry a gun. There are some folks carrying a gun to support the “right to carry”. We’ve all heard the stories, seen you tube videos, of guys in Texas or Arizona carrying an AR15 down the street for no apparent reason other than just to antagonize the cops. Somebody with them always has to have a cell phone camera running to capture the reactions of other people. Don’t misunderstand me. I support the 2nd amendment wholeheartedly. I just don’t want to beat the public over the head with it.

It’s never seen unless I want it to be.

I carry for self-defense. I see this as a very valid reason to carry a gun. I have carried a gun for most of my adult life. I started carrying a handgun when I was in the Army traveling across the country, sometimes alone. At that time in American history, the gun laws were not nearly as stringent as they are now. I could carry almost anywhere I went without fear of being jailed just for having it. As a horseman, I rode a lot in the backcountry. I rode the mountains and desert of Southern California for about 25 years. I never knew what kinds of creatures may be around. There were even a couple times when I had to put down an injured horse. You can’t do that with a pocket knife.

I might want to go hunting. This is one of the dumbest excuses I’ve ever heard. If you’re gonna go hunting, you plan for it ahead of time and prepare. No hunter I’ve ever known has decided on the fly to just go hunting without planning the trip. Even if it’s out the back door, so to speak.

I carry for back-country survival. This would be another valid reason to carry a gun. If you spend a good amount of time in the backcountry, or as some call it, the wilderness, a gun is a necessary part of your survival gear. This is where you don’t need surprises, but you should be prepared for them.

Some Of My Realities

As you can see by this article, I have my own opinions about why I carry a gun, and why some people, both men and women, should not carry. Like I’ve heard some folks say; “just because you can carry a gun, doesn’t mean you should”.

There is also a big difference between “open carry” and “concealed carry”. Lots of jurisdictions around the country allow open carry, which simply means you are allowed to carry your gun in plain sight of anyone. Like I said before; “just because you can, doesn’t mean you should”. Open carry just promotes the wrong message to the general population.

There is so much “bad press” these last few years about guns, that too many of the “regular folks” don’t understand the need or desire to carry guns in public. If “regular” Jane Doe and her 4-year-old daughter see you with a gun in Wal-Mart, they may freak out. They don’t know what your intentions are. All they know is the “fear” that has been instilled in them by the media attention guns attract.

I read an account of an off-duty police officer in a shopping mall parking lot. He was loading his purchases in the back of his car and his shirt rode up a little. A young boy and his mom saw the gun under his shirt, and the boy got “traumatized” by the sight of a gun on his belt. The officer explained that he was an off-duty cop, and it seemed to be OK with them.

A year later, the police dept. was sued for two million dollars because the young child was still traumatized, having nightmares and always in a state of shock.

Open Carry Is A Mistake

Another reason for me not to carry openly is the fact that I will set myself up as the first target of the “mall shooter”. If the bad guy sees my gun then he sees me as the first person to eliminate. The element of surprise should be on my side, not his, (or hers).

I carry a concealed handgun every day, everywhere I go. I am completely at peace with it because I know I have the training to deal with what may come about. I also know how the law will treat me if I have to use the gun, or even if someone sees it poking out from under my shirt. And I have the protection of the US Concealed Carry Association. The only time I carry openly is at home or at the firing range, where I’m expected to be armed.

Open Carry At Home

Liberty Full-Size Gun safe

I mention being armed at home for a couple reasons, First, I’m prepared for a home invasion if it should occur. I don’t live in a high crime area, but thieves don’t always target those places. They want the affluent parts of town where there’s more chance of “better loot”.

Barska Biometric handgun safe

I also carry at home because that’s the safest place for my gun to be when I’m at home. I have two gun safes, one for the handguns and another for the long guns. If I have a house guest of any age, my guns are always secured and I always have one available for use if needed. But the gun available is also secured from my guests due to it being “on my person”. No one can get to it by mistake.

Just A Little Overboard

I spoke with a woman, a nurse, recently who told me she and her husband have a gun hidden in every room of their house. Anytime they have company she has to go through the house and gather all the guns so they can secure them. What a waste of time and energy. What if they forget where they’re all stashed?

I don’t ever have to be concerned with that because my gun is always secure. My 10- and 13-year-old nephews can stop by absolutely any time and I don’t ever have to worry about them finding a gun lying around somewhere “hidden” in a desk drawer or under a couch cushion.

Reasons To Not Carry A Gun

Carrying a gun in public, or even at home, has a tremendous responsibility attached to it. I touched on some of the reasons to not carry in the previous statements, but there are a few other reasons to not carry.

A show of force. I’ve met a few guys that just want to show people that they mean business. Like; Don’t screw with me, I can hurt you. Like; I won’t take your s%&t. You portray the wrong attitude to everyone you come in contact with. These people obviously have the wrong kind of training; or no training at all. If this person were to use his/her gun, the law enforcers would have a field day with them. They would literally have no defense in the court system at all.

Showing a defiance of the establishment. Same situation as above. Defiance of law enforcement is probably the best reason not to carry a gun. You invite trouble wherever you go. This same defiance will show the criminals who you are and just how you think. This makes you their first target because they know they can take your gun from you with little to no effort.

My  Closing Thoughts…

I carry my gun for one reason; self-defense. I carry it concealed because I don’t want to attract the wrong kind of attention. I don’t want to attract any attention at all. This is why it’s called “concealed carry”. I can go absolutely anywhere I want and not have any problems. I’ve carried my gun into numerous so-called gun-free zones, simply because I don’t look or act like I have a gun on me, and I don’t give anyone a reason to think I might. I recently had my gun with me in several federal and state buildings. I inadvertently forgot to leave my gun in the car, and when I got to the door of this building, I saw a sign prohibiting firearms. By then, I either continue or go back to the car. I look and act like a “regular Joe”, and that’s exactly what I want.

What are your reasons to carry a gun? What are your reasons to not carry? I would like to know. Do you have any thoughts about this article? I’d like to know that, too. Please give me your thoughts in the comments area below. I will respond….

Harry

 

 

Filed Under: Public Service, Top

Concealed Carry Law – Concealing guns without permits

August 17, 2016 by HarryJamesGuns

Well, don’t that beat all !! Now Idaho has also joined the states with Constitutional Carry laws. Idaho and W.Virginia at the same time. This now makes almost 20% of the nation with permitless legal concealed carry of firearms. 9 states so far and some others are considering the trend. I wonder if President Obama and his friends are having anxiety attacks. Read the article and see what kinds of limitations will be in place when the new Idaho concealed carry law goes into effect on July 1st……..

 

Anne Taylor, Attorney

Anne Taylor is a pistol packin’ grandma. She’s also an attorney who understands how seriously people take their guns in North Idaho.
“Gun rights are very important in this state,” said Taylor, a criminal attorney, and partner at the firm of Palmer, Walsh & Taylor. “At first glance many are likely to feel that the Second Amendment has been honored and everyone can carry a gun whenever and wherever he or she wishes. It is more complicated than that. It is not a free for all. There are limitations.”

Those limitations can include interstate travel, court-approved diagnoses of mental illness, and individuals under the age of 21. Criminal history plays a large factor, including convictions for domestic violence, assault and felony level drug use, said Taylor.

The core of the new gun law, which goes into effect July 1, will allow Idaho residents to carry concealed weapons without permits. Idaho is one of nine states to pass permitless carry laws and several other states are considering similar legislation. The new law has some in law enforcement apprehensive — primarily because residents won’t be required to take training and safety courses.

“Some of the impacts I see are educating the public as to what the new provisions in the law mean – what they can and can’t do – the legal standard in which they are able to defend themselves with a deadly weapon and the impacts of it if they do,” said Kootenai County Sheriff’s Office Lt. Stu Miller. “There aren’t any training requirements or requirements ensuring a person hasn’t been adjudicated mentally ill to carry without a permit.”

Also, Miller said the new law doesn’t allow a person to carry a concealed weapon onto the property of another without permission, such as a business that has a no-weapons policy on their premises.

Idaho has an estimated 123,000 people with concealed weapons permits. Of those, more than 9,000 reside in Kootenai County. The state will continue to offer enhanced weapons permits, which will allow residents to travel to some states without having to file additional paperwork.
The enhanced permitting process goes beyond the basic background check, requiring training by a certified instructor on how to handle firearms. This includes target shooting.

“One of the basics of weapons training is safety, for example, you are taught not to point a weapon at someone unless you intend to shoot them,” said Teresa Baker, a spokesman with the Idaho State Police. “The concern from law enforcement is always safety and consequences if people will no longer be required to get that training. We hope that those who choose to carry a weapon will still choose to take a training class to learn how to properly protect themselves and their families.”

Under the previous statute, law enforcement could access a database that listed all of the concealed weapons permit holders. That helped officers assess potential encounters. The new law by its very nature makes that database null, which creates another gray area for citizens and law enforcement. If a person carrying a concealed weapon is stopped by law enforcement, should they immediately reveal that to the officer?
“I would say yes,” said Baker. “I would tell the officer immediately.”

However, Taylor believes the response should be on a case by case basis.
“The officer could go on high alert if you do tell them, which could prompt an immediate search of yourself or your vehicle,” said Taylor. “On the other hand, if they see an undisclosed weapon, that could escalate the situation.”

Taylor said the new laws will take a little adjustment from all sides. “It’s a fascinating issue,” she said. “I think people will get used to the new laws, but if you have questions, you should talk to an attorney.”

Taylor provides answers to additional questions on the new permitless weapons laws.

Are there places where a handgun is still prohibited?

A concealed handgun – or any weapon – cannot be taken to a courthouse, juvenile detention center, a jail, a public or private school except by a police officer or security personnel while engaged in their employment, or someone who is authorized to carry a weapon by a person, board or entity having authority over the building or facility.

university-of-gloucesters-008-9260751

Schools will still be ‘gun free zones”

How does this new law impact defense cases involving guns?

The changes in the law mean that since no permit is necessary, a defense attorney, when working with someone charged with carrying a concealed handgun, must consider whether or not his or her client is a person who would be ineligible to carry the handgun. The defense attorney will need to look into the background of the person charged to determine if a valid defense exists.

What convictions can result in a lifetime ban on carrying a firearm?

Idaho Code 18-310 lists many crimes that prohibit a person’s civil right to bear arms from being restored. Those crimes are Treason; Aggravated Assault, Aggravated Battery, Assault with the intent to commit a serious felony; Battery with the intent to commit a serious felony; Burglary; Domestic Battery (felony); intimidating a witness; injury to a child; Sexual abuse of a child; lewd conduct; enticing children (felony); forcible sexual penetration; crime against nature; indecent exposure (felony); sexual exploitation of a child; rape; kidnapping; child abuse; cannibalism; mayhem; unlawful possession of a firearm; rescuing prisoners; escape; robbery; felony-level drug charges; threats against state officials of any branch of government; discharging a firearm at a home or occupied building or vehicle; possession or using a bomb or explosive; manslaughter or murder. Attempts, conspiracies or solicitation for any of the named crimes is included.

Can I get my firearm rights back?

A person can apply to have their firearm rights restored after five years of completion of all prison time, probation or parole. This application goes to the Commission of Pardons and Parole. That commission will not consider a person’s civil rights to possess a weapon if they’ve been convicted of treason, murder or voluntary manslaughter.

What are the restrictions on permitless carry?

People under the influence of alcohol or drugs cannot carry a concealed weapon.   23778757-old-friends-three-happy-friends-drinking-beer-at-the-pub-6029476

Can I go to neighboring states without having to get a permit there?

Neighboring states have their own laws about concealed weapons. Idaho can issue an Enhanced Concealed Carry Permit, which has specific provisions that must be met. This permit is recognized by many other states. If an Idaho resident travels frequently it is still a good idea to obtain an Enhanced Permit.

Can people who have been punished for carrying without a permit have those crimes expunged?

The new provisions for concealed carry do not mean old convictions automatically go away. The procedure to evaluate a conviction and determine if something can be done is a more in-depth analysis.

Who is still restricted from carrying a concealed handgun?

Anyone under 22 years of age. However, the local sheriff must issue a concealed weapons permit if age is the only reason a person would be unable to carry a concealed weapon. Any person who is ineligible to possess a firearm for other reasons pursuant to Idaho or Federal laws. People who illegally use controlled substances (drugs) and people who currently have, or have been found to have mental illness or a lack of mental capacity (unless his or her civil right to bear arms has been restored). People who have been dishonorably discharged from serving in the armed forces. Anyone who has been convicted of a crime punishable by more than one year in jail, unless that person has successfully completed probation (felony-level offenses). Anyone with a misdemeanor conviction for a crime of violence (attempted or threatened) against a person or property unless the probation term was successfully completed. Anyone living illegally in the United States or anyone who has renounced his or her citizenship. A person who has a pending criminal case for a crime which would disqualify him or her from carrying a concealed handgun.

Anyone who is subject to a protection order.

What other impacts will this new law have on the legal system?

This change in law will mean that an attorney will need to thoroughly investigate for a client. While this change in law is exciting in an environment where we so often hear about the need for gun control, it is important to really understand the changes before going out with your handgun holstered under your jacket or tucked into your glove compartment. A careful analysis is necessary. An attorney is a good resource to look at your particular situation and answer questions.

 

My View on Idaho’s New Concealed Carry Law

This will actually mirror my opinion of W. Virginia’s new law.

What Idaho did is completely legal according to the Constitution. Many people today are calling it “Constitutional Carry” and the term seems to fit nicely. I approve of the new law, but I question the wisdom of not requiring proper training beforehand. I firmly believe anyone wanting to carry a weapon, whether it’s concealed or not, should have a certain degree of training. It may come from years of training by family members with the experience to do an adequate job of teaching their kids, or another “qualified” instructor. I think, somehow you should be asked to show your competence at responsible gun handling.

Some law enforcement agencies may have concerns with this but just look at the other seven states with Constitutional Carry. They don’t seem to have a problem with it, so why would Idaho? This looks like a building trend, doesn’t it? Years ago there were only a couple states with relaxed gun laws. Now there are nine of them. Soon I expect we will be seeing more states joining in. Maybe soon we will also see cooperation with states recognizing all other carry permits just like they do with your driver’s license. Wouldn’t that be an improvement?

As always, if you would like to leave your comments on this article or it’s separate contents, please write a comment in the space provided below. And thanks for reading. I hope you got something good out of it.

–Written by Marc Stewart, Director of Sponsored Content.

Source:  http://cdapress.com/article_89d9b050-257f-11e6-8f71-738e07944ea5.html

Filed Under: Public Service, Top

Should Doctors Talk To Patients About Guns?

August 17, 2016 by HarryJamesGuns

youthhandgunclasses640-3812497

This article came to me through my Google Alerts and it hit me as something you would like to know about. It’s not something I agree with, but you may agree. So as in keeping with the purpose of this website, I will share it with you for your edification.

Most gun owners I have talked with and heard in the gun society do not believe this is what the Doctors purpose is and think it’s an encroachment of the Gov’t. Read it and decide for yourself…..

Instructor Jerry Kau shows student Joanna Zuber how to hold a handgun during a Youth Handgun Safety Class in East Dundee, Ill. (photo by Jim Young, REUTERS)

Doctors should be talking with their patients about gun safety, just as they talk with them about other potential risks to their health, such as smoking, wearing seatbelts and alcohol consumption, argues an article published online Tuesday in the Annals of Internal Medicine.

Yet few doctors discuss gun safety with their patients, the article points out. Sometimes, doctors believe — wrongly — that federal or state laws or regulations prohibit them from doing so. Other times, they simply aren’t sure how to go about it.

“Physicians generally do not do well at firearm-related injury prevention,” writes Dr. Garen Wintemute, director of the violence prevention research program at the University of California-Davis, and his co-authors. “They ask infrequently about firearms and counsel poorly, if at all, though they are aware that the high lethality of firearms makes prevention efforts particularly important.”

Gun violence is a major public-health issue in the United States. In 2014, more than 33,000 Americans died of gunshot wounds. Although the risk for gun-related homicide is highest among young African American men, most gun-related deaths are suicides — and the group at highest risk for those is older white men.

Young children are also at risk, often after finding loaded, unlocked guns in a home in which they’re living or visiting. So far this year, 202 children under the age of 11 in the U.S. have been injured or killed by guns, according to the Gun Violence Archive. Among the most recent victims were 10-year-old Colin Fraley, who shot and killed himself with his stepfather’s gun, and 5-year-old Mariah Davis, who died after shooting herself in the neck with a .38 caliber handgun she found under her grandmother’s pillow.

Physicians are in a unique position to help prevent these tragedies, stress Wintemute and his colleagues.

What the law says

Several barriers interfere, however, with physicians practicing preventive medicine for gun-related injuries. Some physicians hold the unfounded belief that it’s against the law for them to bring up gun safety with their patients.

“No federal or state statute prohibits physicians from asking about firearms when such information is relevant to the health of the patient or others,” write Wintemute and his co-authors.

The only existing gag law is Florida’s medical privacy act, which says that health practitioners “should refrain” from asking patients about firearms and “may not intentionally enter” information about firearms into medical records.

But even this law contains broad exceptions. “A practitioner who ‘in good faith believes that this information is relevant to the patient’s medical care or safety, or the safety of others’ may ask about firearms, and only information that ‘is not relevant to the patient’s medical care or safety, or the safety of others” is excluded from medical records,” Wintemute and his co-authors explain. (The Florida law is currently being challenged in the courts as unduly restricting the First Amendment rights of doctors and other health professionals.)

Wintemute’s article also mentions two Minnesota’s statutes, which prohibit the state’s health officials and MNsure from collecting information about individual firearm ownership. But Minnesota does not have a gag provision aimed at doctors.

Counseling high-risk patients

Wintemute and his colleagues recommend that doctors, at a minimum, determine the access to guns of patients who fall into a high-risk category for gun violence. They can then counsel those patients about safety measures for preventing gun-related injuries and deaths, such as safe storage options.

“Studies of patient perspective on firearm counseling have found that most — though certainly not all — patients seem to be open to nonjudgmental education, especially for members of high-risk groups,” Wintemute and his co-authors write.

They offer detailed advice in the article to doctors and other health professionals about how to identify people at risk of gun violence — and how to talk with those people about gun safety.

High-risk patients include those who express suicidal or homicidal thoughts, those with a history of violence to themselves or others, those with alcohol or drug abuse, and those with serious mental disorders or other conditions that impair their thinking and judgment, such as dementia. It also includes patients in high-risk demographic groups, such as young African American men, middle-aged and older white men, and parents or others with children and adolescents living in their homes.

In some cases — when it’s necessary to prevent a serious and imminent threat to the health and safety of the patient or the public — the doctor may need to disclose the danger to third parties, including law enforcement officials and/or family members of the patient. No federal law prohibits such disclosure, Wintemute and his colleagues stress.

They also point out that most studies that have examined the effectiveness of doctors talking with their patients about the risk of gun-related injuries have concluded that such talks increase gun-safety behaviors.

None of the studies has found that such discussions result in any harm to the patients.

A needed start

“Just as with any other health behavior, no one expects that this [talking with patients about gun safety] will work all the time or even most of the time,” Wintemute told Time magazine reporter Alice Park. “But it’s going to work some of the time, and it’s going to be part of a continuing conversation we need to have about the net benefit or risk of exposure to firearms.”

“We don’t know nearly enough about how best to deliver this information to patients to maximize its effectiveness,” he added. “But the fact that we don’t know everything now is not a reason not to start now. We need to start now, and reserve the right to get smarter.”

FMI: You’ll find an abstract of the article by Wintemute and his colleagues on the Annals of Internal Medicine website, but, unfortunately, the full article is behind a paywall. For rules about gun safety in homes with children, see the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommendations. The best preventive measure, stresses the AAP, is not to own a gun. The organization also recommend that parents talk to the parents of their children’s friends to find out if they have guns in their homes and, if so, to confirm that those guns are unloaded, locked up and inaccessible to children.

My Views Again….

In my opinion as a gun owner and licensed concealed carrier, this is not part of internal medicine, and should not be included in a medical examination. Doctors are not experts in gun handling and safety     ( unless they are gun owners themselves, as many Dr’s. are). Also, the American Academy of Pediatrics are not gun safety experts and don’t fully understand correct gun handling procedures in the home. In my opinion, the best preventive measure for protecting children in the home is to have your gun “in a holster on your hip” at all times. The child can’t touch it without you knowing immediately, and you have full access to it at any given time.

Training in GunHandling

Proper training in the handling and safety of guns in the home can be accessed through the

USCCA Logo

US Concealed Carry Association and at the  Front Sight Firearms Training Institute, located just outside of Las Vegas, Nevada. There are also a great many of suitable gun training facilities all around the country. I would even suggest having Doctors and nurses get involved in “real, correct” training to apply to their trade if they follow the Gov.t mandates.

I would like to hear what you have to say about this subject, too. Please leave your comments below.

Thanks for reading. I hope this has been enlightening for you.

Front Sight training class in action

Harry….

Thanks for visiting

Filed Under: Top, Training

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Front Sight Training Institute – Gun Training At It’s Finest
  • Manual Safeties On Handguns
  • Guns And Home Security
  • Will You Stand Up for the USCCA?
  • Gun Laws Don’t Work On Criminals

Footer

Disclamer

This Website is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program.

Popular

20151114_162222-300x169-1881851

Self Defense Handgun Training – Do We Really Need It?

Recent Post

  • Front Sight Training Institute – Gun Training At It’s Finest
  • Manual Safeties On Handguns

Categories

  • Public Service
  • Reviews
  • Top
  • Training
  • Uncategorized

Search

Also Read

betty-kahr-2-150x150-6886131

Use Of Firearms For Personal Safety And Defense

February 2, 2019 By HarryJamesGuns

Copyright © 2021 · News Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in